In context of Voyage Charter Party ,
there are certain claims/costs which can be recovered from Charterers under
that CP. It is very imperative that the documentation and time limitation
requirements are strictly adhered to, otherwise Charterers' may have a valid
reason to time bar that claim.
In general, the commercial intention
is to ensure that claims are made by the Owners within a short period of final
discharge, so that they they can investigated and settled while the facts are
still fresh. [ Mr. Justice Bingham in The Oltenia]
Different Charter
Parties have different period allowances for submitting a claim, and quite
often, such periods are discussed and agreed upon in the pre-fixture stage.
1. How broadly can the time bar
clause be interpreted?
It is important to note the
wording of the clause, as some Charter Parties require a Notice of demurrage to
be sent, and followed by the actual claim with all supporting documents, for
example, in case of Chevron Terms, which are additional Terms to the
Asbatankvoy CP. Another example is the wording in BP Voyage CPs, which normally
says:"substantiating each and every constituent part of the claim".
This means that each commencement of time, deduction, completion of time etc
should be duly supported by the necessary documents. In case of ShellVoy
Charter Parties, they require additional signatures on the load/discharge port
timesheets.
An important and oft quoted case with regards to the strictness of the documentation requirement is that of "The Obo Venture"[1992]. It was a requirement of the CP that signed Charter Parties were to be provided for complete submission of the demurrage claim. As the Owners had failed to fulfill this requirement, the claim was time barred.
An important and oft quoted case with regards to the strictness of the documentation requirement is that of "The Obo Venture"[1992]. It was a requirement of the CP that signed Charter Parties were to be provided for complete submission of the demurrage claim. As the Owners had failed to fulfill this requirement, the claim was time barred.
One aspect to be kept in mind is
that the Charterers' may require the full documentation to recover costs from
their third parties, and the Courts may look at this angle also while deciding
on a time bar issue.
However, Owners can take comfort in
that fact that, as the result of not adhering to the time limit can be quite
severe, the Courts are consistent that a time bar clause should be
un-ambiguous. Hence, any ambiguity in the time bar clause goes in favor of the
Ship Owner under the Contra Proferentem Rule.
2. Can I revise my claim after the time bar?
Yes, you can. Unless there is
such a drastic revision that the claim after revision takes on the form of an
entirely new claim and with new supporting documents.
Below is a snapshot of the time bars in common Tanker Charter Parties and their Clauses. I will discuss a few more questions and about Bulker time bars in my next post on the same topic. Till then.. Namaste!
Below is a snapshot of the time bars in common Tanker Charter Parties and their Clauses. I will discuss a few more questions and about Bulker time bars in my next post on the same topic. Till then.. Namaste!
Disclaimer: The above article are views expressed by the author. Please consult expert opinion prior using same. Any unintentional breach of copyright is totally unintended. Please highlight same, if any, so that necessary corrective action may be taken.
No comments:
Post a Comment